Archive: discontinued method
These weekly summaries were produced from 2026-03 to 2026-10 by a weekly AI-generated scoring that this site no longer uses. Their scores are not comparable with the current figures, which come from public datasets. Why the method changed
Weekly AI Job Risk Summary — September 23, 2026
This week’s AI job risk update is mostly stable, with only small relative changes across occupations. The biggest signals came from cybersecurity, education content, software, and surveillance-related workflows rather than broad labor replacement. News that widely available AI chatbots are accelerating vulnerability discovery raises AI job risk for some coding, QA, IT support, and cyber tasks because routine debugging, testing, and issue triage are becoming easier to automate. At the same time, reports on failures of AI-enabled border surveillance systems are a reminder that high-stakes field operations still need human judgment, reducing near-term replacement pressure for some security and investigative roles. In education, Napster’s push to digitally clone teachers supports slightly higher risk for curriculum, tutoring, and training content work, though fully replacing teachers remains less likely. Overall, the pattern for jobs AI will replace versus more AI-proof jobs remains incremental: clerical, repetitive digital, and standardized content roles stay most exposed, while licensed, physical, and trust-heavy roles remain comparatively resilient.
How to Read This Week
This report works best when you read the summary, score movement, and linked news together. Treat it as a weekly reading of changing automation pressure, not as a one-week prediction that a profession will immediately disappear.
Weekly Average Risk
47.00
Week-over-week change
+0.09
Jobs moving up
21
Jobs moving down
3
Jobs unchanged
180
Trend
The chart shows how the overall weekly average has moved. It helps separate a broad market shift from changes limited to a smaller set of jobs.
Where Pressure Rose First
These jobs posted the strongest upward moves this week. Read them as signs of where automation pressure is tightening fastest right now.
Where Pressure Eased
These jobs moved downward this week. A lower score does not mean the role is safe forever, but it does suggest less immediate pressure relative to the prior week.
Roles That Stayed Relatively Steady
These jobs changed little this week and help anchor the broader picture. Stability often matters as much as movement when judging whether a shift is broad or narrow.
This Week Ranking
Use the full ranking as a current snapshot of relative pressure across jobs. The score alone matters less than the combination of score, week-over-week change, and the task mix behind the role.
| Rank | Job | Risk Score | Last Week | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Software Tester | 96 | +1 | |
| 2 | Scheduler | 96 | +0 | |
| 3 | Customer Support Representative | 93 | +0 | |
| 4 | Call Center Agent | 92 | +0 | |
| 5 | Customer Support | 89 | +0 | |
| 6 | QA Engineer | 88 | +1 | |
| 7 | Administrative Assistant | 88 | +0 | |
| 8 | Office Clerk | 88 | +0 | |
| 9 | Data Analyst | 87 | +0 | |
| 10 | Copywriter | 86 | +0 | |
| 11 | Telemarketer | 84 | +0 | |
| 12 | Data Entry Clerk | 83 | +0 | |
| 13 | Content Writer | 83 | +0 | |
| 14 | Software Engineer | 82 | +1 | |
| 15 | Programmer | 81 | +1 | |
| 16 | Mobile App Developer | 81 | +1 | |
| 17 | Receptionist | 81 | +0 | |
| 18 | Social Media Manager | 79 | +1 | |
| 19 | Retail Cashier | 80 | +0 | |
| 20 | Digital Marketer | 79 | +1 | |
| 21 | SEO Specialist | 78 | +1 | |
| 22 | Bookkeeper | 78 | +0 | |
| 23 | Proofreader | 77 | +0 | |
| 24 | Accounting Clerk | 77 | +0 | |
| 25 | Court Reporter | 77 | +0 | |
| 26 | Paralegal | 76 | +0 | |
| 27 | System Administrator | 75 | +1 | |
| 28 | Illustrator | 76 | +0 | |
| 29 | Truck Driver | 76 | +0 | |
| 30 | Insurance Underwriter | 75 | +0 |
Exposure runs from 0 to 100 and compares occupations with each other, using public datasets (see sources). It is not a probability that the job disappears. Methodology
AI News Used In This Weekly Evaluation
The articles below are the main signals used in this week's evaluation. Read them as context for why pressure rose, fell, or stayed stable.
Wired / September 21, 2026
MIT Technology Review / September 21, 2026
MIT Technology Review / September 21, 2026
MIT Technology Review / September 21, 2026
MIT Technology Review / September 21, 2026
Wired / September 21, 2026
Wired / September 20, 2026
Wired / September 20, 2026
Wired / September 19, 2026
Wired / September 19, 2026
Wired / September 19, 2026
Wired / September 18, 2026
Wired / September 18, 2026
Wired / September 18, 2026
MIT Technology Review / September 18, 2026
Wired / September 18, 2026
Wired / September 18, 2026
Wired / September 18, 2026
Wired / September 18, 2026
Wired / September 18, 2026
Past Weeks
- Weekly summary October 7, 2026
- Weekly summary September 30, 2026
- Weekly summary September 16, 2026
- Weekly summary September 9, 2026
- Weekly summary September 2, 2026
- Weekly summary August 26, 2026
- Weekly summary August 19, 2026
- Weekly summary August 12, 2026
- Weekly summary August 5, 2026
- Weekly summary July 29, 2026
- Weekly summary July 22, 2026
- Weekly summary July 15, 2026
- Weekly summary July 8, 2026
- Weekly summary July 1, 2026
- Weekly summary June 24, 2026
- Weekly summary June 17, 2026
- Weekly summary June 10, 2026
- Weekly summary June 3, 2026
- Weekly summary May 27, 2026
- Weekly summary May 20, 2026
- Weekly summary May 13, 2026
- Weekly summary May 6, 2026
- Weekly summary April 29, 2026
- Weekly summary April 22, 2026
- Weekly summary April 15, 2026
- Weekly summary April 8, 2026
- Weekly summary April 1, 2026
- Weekly summary March 25, 2026
- Weekly summary March 18, 2026
- Weekly summary March 14, 2026
- Weekly summary March 5, 2026