Archive: discontinued method
These weekly summaries were produced from 2026-03 to 2026-10 by a weekly AI-generated scoring that this site no longer uses. Their scores are not comparable with the current figures, which come from public datasets. Why the method changed
Weekly AI Job Risk Summary — June 17, 2026
This week’s AI job risk update is modest overall, with only small relative shifts across the list. The biggest labor-market signal is continued progress in autonomous AI agents and AI coding: OpenAI is reportedly leading ChatGPT’s biggest transformation yet, while Google DeepMind is publicly warning about a future where millions of agents act online with limited human oversight. That raises near-term pressure on digital knowledge work tied to repeatable analysis, coding, support, and workflow execution—categories often discussed in searches for jobs AI will replace and jobs at risk from AI. At the same time, legal and reliability news pulled some scores down: a German court ruling on liability for false AI outputs, Anthropic’s government-ordered model rollback, and another wrongful-arrest case tied to face recognition all reinforce deployment friction in law, policing, and other high-accountability domains. Creative image and video work saw a slight uptick from Apple’s AI photo features and Meta’s smart-glasses computer vision work, while clearly hands-on and trust-intensive AI-proof jobs stayed broadly stable.
How to Read This Week
This report works best when you read the summary, score movement, and linked news together. Treat it as a weekly reading of changing automation pressure, not as a one-week prediction that a profession will immediately disappear.
Weekly Average Risk
45.35
Week-over-week change
+0.11
Jobs moving up
30
Jobs moving down
6
Jobs unchanged
168
Trend
The chart shows how the overall weekly average has moved. It helps separate a broad market shift from changes limited to a smaller set of jobs.
Where Pressure Rose First
These jobs posted the strongest upward moves this week. Read them as signs of where automation pressure is tightening fastest right now.
Where Pressure Eased
These jobs moved downward this week. A lower score does not mean the role is safe forever, but it does suggest less immediate pressure relative to the prior week.
Roles That Stayed Relatively Steady
These jobs changed little this week and help anchor the broader picture. Stability often matters as much as movement when judging whether a shift is broad or narrow.
This Week Ranking
Use the full ranking as a current snapshot of relative pressure across jobs. The score alone matters less than the combination of score, week-over-week change, and the task mix behind the role.
| Rank | Job | Risk Score | Last Week | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scheduler | 89 | +0 | |
| 2 | Call Center Agent | 85 | +0 | |
| 3 | Customer Support Representative | 82 | +1 | |
| 4 | Software Tester | 81 | +1 | |
| 5 | Data Entry Clerk | 81 | +0 | |
| 6 | Copywriter | 80 | +1 | |
| 7 | Telemarketer | 81 | +0 | |
| 8 | Office Clerk | 80 | +0 | |
| 9 | Customer Support | 78 | +1 | |
| 10 | Administrative Assistant | 79 | +0 | |
| 11 | Content Writer | 77 | +1 | |
| 12 | Retail Cashier | 78 | +0 | |
| 13 | Bookkeeper | 77 | +0 | |
| 14 | Court Reporter | 77 | +0 | |
| 15 | Data Analyst | 76 | +1 | |
| 16 | Truck Driver | 77 | +0 | |
| 17 | Accounting Clerk | 76 | +0 | |
| 18 | Proofreader | 75 | +0 | |
| 19 | Paralegal | 74 | +0 | |
| 20 | Social Media Manager | 73 | +1 | |
| 21 | QA Engineer | 73 | +1 | |
| 22 | Receptionist | 74 | +0 | |
| 23 | SEO Specialist | 73 | +1 | |
| 24 | Digital Marketer | 73 | +1 | |
| 25 | Illustrator | 73 | +1 | |
| 26 | Translator | 73 | +0 | |
| 27 | Civil Drafter | 73 | +0 | |
| 28 | Delivery Driver | 73 | +0 | |
| 29 | Insurance Underwriter | 72 | +0 | |
| 30 | Mobile App Developer | 71 | +1 |
Exposure runs from 0 to 100 and compares occupations with each other, using public datasets (see sources). It is not a probability that the job disappears. Methodology
AI News Used In This Weekly Evaluation
The articles below are the main signals used in this week's evaluation. Read them as context for why pressure rose, fell, or stayed stable.
Wired / June 15, 2026
Wired / June 13, 2026
Wired / June 13, 2026
Wired / June 12, 2026
Wired / June 12, 2026
Wired / June 12, 2026
Wired / June 12, 2026
Wired / June 12, 2026
Wired / June 11, 2026
MIT Technology Review / June 11, 2026
Wired / June 11, 2026
Wired / June 11, 2026
Wired / June 11, 2026
Wired / June 10, 2026
Wired / June 10, 2026
Past Weeks
- Weekly summary October 7, 2026
- Weekly summary September 30, 2026
- Weekly summary September 23, 2026
- Weekly summary September 16, 2026
- Weekly summary September 9, 2026
- Weekly summary September 2, 2026
- Weekly summary August 26, 2026
- Weekly summary August 19, 2026
- Weekly summary August 12, 2026
- Weekly summary August 5, 2026
- Weekly summary July 29, 2026
- Weekly summary July 22, 2026
- Weekly summary July 15, 2026
- Weekly summary July 8, 2026
- Weekly summary July 1, 2026
- Weekly summary June 24, 2026
- Weekly summary June 10, 2026
- Weekly summary June 3, 2026
- Weekly summary May 27, 2026
- Weekly summary May 20, 2026
- Weekly summary May 13, 2026
- Weekly summary May 6, 2026
- Weekly summary April 29, 2026
- Weekly summary April 22, 2026
- Weekly summary April 15, 2026
- Weekly summary April 8, 2026
- Weekly summary April 1, 2026
- Weekly summary March 25, 2026
- Weekly summary March 18, 2026
- Weekly summary March 14, 2026
- Weekly summary March 5, 2026