Weekly AI Job Risk Summary
This week’s AI job risk update is broadly stable, with only modest relative moves across occupations. The strongest signals came from finance AI adoption, growing use of generative AI in coding and app creation, and continued disruption in creative work. McKinsey’s finance-focused coverage and reporting on advanced AI in finance support slightly higher risk for bookkeeping, accounting support, underwriting, and analyst-heavy office roles as automation spreads into reporting, reconciliation, document handling, and forecasting. Reports on “vibe-coded” apps and exposed data show that AI can now generate more software and web work quickly, raising pressure on routine programming, QA, and web production tasks even as governance and security gaps keep fully autonomous replacement limited. In media and entertainment, reporting that Hollywood workers are secretly training AI and that unauthorized AI remixes are proliferating reinforces higher pressure on animation, illustration, translation, and editing-adjacent creative jobs. At the same time, AI-proof jobs tied to physical dexterity, face-to-face trust, licensing, and real-world accountability remain comparatively resilient in the jobs at risk from AI ranking.
This Week in Context
These paragraphs turn the weekly table into a readable explanation of where automation pressure broadened, narrowed, or stayed steady.
The weekly average risk moved upward, which suggests pressure broadened rather than staying isolated to only a few roles.
The clearest upward pressure appeared in Office Clerk, Bookkeeper, Software Tester. Moves like these often show where AI is taking on more repeatable drafting, comparison, coordination, or first-pass analytical work.
Relative pressure eased most in AI Engineer, Cybersecurity Analyst, Machine Learning Engineer. That does not make these roles permanently safe, but it does suggest this week's signals were less aggressive than in the roles moving upward.
Urban Planner, Urban Farmer, Investment Banker changed little and help anchor the baseline for this week. Stable roles matter because they show where the ranking is holding its shape even while other parts of the market move.
Read these paragraphs together with the linked news and the full ranking. The point is not a one-week prediction of replacement, but a clearer view of where automation pressure is concentrating first.
How to Read This Week
This report works best when you read the summary, score movement, and linked news together. Treat it as a weekly reading of changing automation pressure, not as a one-week prediction that a profession will immediately disappear.
Weekly Average Risk
44.80
Week-over-week change
+0.15
Jobs moving up
35
Jobs moving down
3
Jobs unchanged
166
Trend
The chart shows how the overall weekly average has moved. It helps separate a broad market shift from changes limited to a smaller set of jobs.
Where Pressure Rose First
These jobs posted the strongest upward moves this week. Read them as signs of where automation pressure is tightening fastest right now.
Where Pressure Eased
These jobs moved downward this week. A lower score does not mean the role is safe forever, but it does suggest less immediate pressure relative to the prior week.
Roles That Stayed Relatively Steady
These jobs changed little this week and help anchor the broader picture. Stability often matters as much as movement when judging whether a shift is broad or narrow.
This Week Ranking
Use the full ranking as a current snapshot of relative pressure across jobs. The score alone matters less than the combination of score, week-over-week change, and the task mix behind the role.
| Rank | Job | Risk Score | Last Week | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scheduler | 86 | +0 | |
| 2 | Call Center Agent | 85 | +0 | |
| 3 | Customer Support Representative | 82 | +0 | |
| 4 | Data Entry Clerk | 81 | +0 | |
| 5 | Telemarketer | 81 | +0 | |
| 6 | Office Clerk | 78 | +1 | |
| 7 | Customer Support | 78 | +0 | |
| 8 | Retail Cashier | 78 | +0 | |
| 9 | Bookkeeper | 76 | +1 | |
| 10 | Software Tester | 76 | +1 | |
| 11 | Copywriter | 76 | +1 | |
| 12 | Truck Driver | 77 | +0 | |
| 13 | Administrative Assistant | 75 | +1 | |
| 14 | Accounting Clerk | 75 | +1 | |
| 15 | Data Analyst | 75 | +1 | |
| 16 | Proofreader | 74 | +1 | |
| 17 | Court Reporter | 75 | +0 | |
| 18 | Content Writer | 73 | +1 | |
| 19 | Receptionist | 74 | +0 | |
| 20 | Translator | 72 | +1 | |
| 21 | Paralegal | 73 | +0 | |
| 22 | Insurance Underwriter | 72 | +1 | |
| 23 | Civil Drafter | 73 | +0 | |
| 24 | Delivery Driver | 73 | +0 | |
| 25 | Taxi Driver | 71 | +0 | |
| 26 | Social Media Manager | 69 | +1 | |
| 27 | Travel Agent | 70 | +0 | |
| 28 | SEO Specialist | 70 | +0 | |
| 29 | Digital Marketer | 69 | +1 | |
| 30 | Illustrator | 69 | +1 |
AI News Used In This Weekly Evaluation
The articles below are the main signals used in this week's evaluation. Read them as context for why pressure rose, fell, or stayed stable.
Wired / 2026-05-11
MIT Technology Review / 2026-05-11
MIT Technology Review / 2026-05-11
MIT Technology Review / 2026-05-11
Wired / 2026-05-09
Wired / 2026-05-08
Wired / 2026-05-08
Wired / 2026-05-08
Wired / 2026-05-08
MIT Technology Review / 2026-05-08
Wired / 2026-05-07
Wired / 2026-05-07
Wired / 2026-05-07
Wired / 2026-05-07
Wired / 2026-05-06
Wired / 2026-05-06
Wired / 2026-05-06
Wired / 2026-05-06
Past Weeks
- Weekly summary July 8, 2026
- Weekly summary July 1, 2026
- Weekly summary June 24, 2026
- Weekly summary June 17, 2026
- Weekly summary June 10, 2026
- Weekly summary June 3, 2026
- Weekly summary May 27, 2026
- Weekly summary May 20, 2026
- Weekly summary May 6, 2026
- Weekly summary April 29, 2026
- Weekly summary April 22, 2026
- Weekly summary April 15, 2026
- Weekly summary April 8, 2026
- Weekly summary April 1, 2026
- Weekly summary March 25, 2026
- Weekly summary March 18, 2026
- Weekly summary March 14, 2026
- Weekly summary March 5, 2026