Archive: discontinued method
These weekly summaries were produced from 2026-03 to 2026-10 by a weekly AI-generated scoring that this site no longer uses. Their scores are not comparable with the current figures, which come from public datasets. Why the method changed
Weekly AI Job Risk Summary — March 25, 2026
This week’s AI job risk update is mostly stable, with only small relative moves across professions. The strongest signals came from better AI infrastructure and workflow automation: Gimlet Labs’ multi-chip inference push, Amazon’s Trainium momentum, and Littlebird’s real-time screen-reading assistant all improve the practicality of AI for office software, admin support, data handling, coding, and digital content tasks. That slightly raises exposure for some of the jobs at risk from AI in clerical, support, and software-adjacent work. At the same time, several headlines reinforced limits on full replacement: AI delusion concerns, compliance controversy, and defense-sector governance disputes highlight reliability, oversight, and accountability gaps. Those constraints slightly lower near-term replacement risk for trust-heavy roles like auditors, cybersecurity analysts, and lawyers. Overall, the ranking of jobs AI will replace versus more AI-proof jobs changed only modestly this week: routine screen-based work edged up, while regulated, judgment-intensive, and high-accountability roles held firmer.
How to Read This Week
This report works best when you read the summary, score movement, and linked news together. Treat it as a weekly reading of changing automation pressure, not as a one-week prediction that a profession will immediately disappear.
Weekly Average Risk
43.97
Week-over-week change
+0.04
Jobs moving up
16
Jobs moving down
9
Jobs unchanged
179
Trend
The chart shows how the overall weekly average has moved. It helps separate a broad market shift from changes limited to a smaller set of jobs.
Where Pressure Rose First
These jobs posted the strongest upward moves this week. Read them as signs of where automation pressure is tightening fastest right now.
Where Pressure Eased
These jobs moved downward this week. A lower score does not mean the role is safe forever, but it does suggest less immediate pressure relative to the prior week.
Roles That Stayed Relatively Steady
These jobs changed little this week and help anchor the broader picture. Stability often matters as much as movement when judging whether a shift is broad or narrow.
This Week Ranking
Use the full ranking as a current snapshot of relative pressure across jobs. The score alone matters less than the combination of score, week-over-week change, and the task mix behind the role.
| Rank | Job | Risk Score | Last Week | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scheduler | 81 | +1 | |
| 2 | Data Entry Clerk | 80 | +1 | |
| 3 | Call Center Agent | 81 | +0 | |
| 4 | Telemarketer | 80 | +0 | |
| 5 | Retail Cashier | 78 | +0 | |
| 6 | Truck Driver | 77 | +0 | |
| 7 | Customer Support Representative | 75 | +1 | |
| 8 | Bookkeeper | 74 | +1 | |
| 9 | Office Clerk | 74 | +1 | |
| 10 | Court Reporter | 75 | +0 | |
| 11 | Accounting Clerk | 73 | +1 | |
| 12 | Proofreader | 73 | +0 | |
| 13 | Delivery Driver | 73 | +0 | |
| 14 | Customer Support | 71 | +1 | |
| 15 | Paralegal | 72 | +0 | |
| 16 | Insurance Underwriter | 72 | +0 | |
| 17 | Civil Drafter | 72 | +0 | |
| 18 | Software Tester | 70 | +1 | |
| 19 | Copywriter | 71 | +0 | |
| 20 | Administrative Assistant | 69 | +2 | |
| 21 | Taxi Driver | 71 | +0 | |
| 22 | Translator | 70 | +0 | |
| 23 | Receptionist | 69 | +1 | |
| 24 | Data Analyst | 69 | +1 | |
| 25 | Travel Agent | 69 | +0 | |
| 26 | Bank Teller | 69 | +0 | |
| 27 | Illustrator | 69 | +0 | |
| 28 | Content Writer | 68 | +0 | |
| 29 | Tax Preparer | 67 | +0 | |
| 30 | System Administrator | 67 | +0 |
Exposure runs from 0 to 100 and compares occupations with each other, using public datasets (see sources). It is not a probability that the job disappears. Methodology
AI News Used In This Weekly Evaluation
The articles below are the main signals used in this week's evaluation. Read them as context for why pressure rose, fell, or stayed stable.
Wired / March 23, 2026
MIT Technology Review / March 23, 2026
Wired / March 23, 2026
TechCrunch / March 23, 2026
TechCrunch / March 23, 2026
TechCrunch / March 23, 2026
TechCrunch / March 23, 2026
TechCrunch / March 23, 2026
MIT Technology Review / March 23, 2026
TechCrunch / March 22, 2026
TechCrunch / March 22, 2026
TechCrunch / March 22, 2026
TechCrunch / March 22, 2026
TechCrunch / March 22, 2026
TechCrunch / March 22, 2026
Wired / March 21, 2026
Wired / March 21, 2026
TechCrunch / March 21, 2026
TechCrunch / March 21, 2026
TechCrunch / March 21, 2026
Past Weeks
- Weekly summary October 7, 2026
- Weekly summary September 30, 2026
- Weekly summary September 23, 2026
- Weekly summary September 16, 2026
- Weekly summary September 9, 2026
- Weekly summary September 2, 2026
- Weekly summary August 26, 2026
- Weekly summary August 19, 2026
- Weekly summary August 12, 2026
- Weekly summary August 5, 2026
- Weekly summary July 29, 2026
- Weekly summary July 22, 2026
- Weekly summary July 15, 2026
- Weekly summary July 8, 2026
- Weekly summary July 1, 2026
- Weekly summary June 24, 2026
- Weekly summary June 17, 2026
- Weekly summary June 10, 2026
- Weekly summary June 3, 2026
- Weekly summary May 27, 2026
- Weekly summary May 20, 2026
- Weekly summary May 13, 2026
- Weekly summary May 6, 2026
- Weekly summary April 29, 2026
- Weekly summary April 22, 2026
- Weekly summary April 15, 2026
- Weekly summary April 8, 2026
- Weekly summary April 1, 2026
- Weekly summary March 18, 2026
- Weekly summary March 14, 2026
- Weekly summary March 5, 2026