Weekly AI Job Risk Summary — August 26, 2026

This week’s AI job risk update is shaped less by breakthrough consumer automation and more by deployment evidence in education, enterprise infrastructure, policing, and robotics. The strongest signals for jobs at risk from AI came from classroom adoption of LLMs, expanding enterprise focus on agent orchestration and infrastructure, and reports of robots learning on the spot—developments that slightly raise pressure on coding, analysis, instructional, and repetitive knowledge-work roles. At the same time, backlash around deepfakes in schools, resistance to Palantir in UK health systems, and concerns over agent safety and watermark workarounds highlight why many AI-proof jobs still retain human oversight, trust, and accountability advantages. Relative to last week, most scores stay stable because the news mostly confirms existing trends rather than proving immediate end-to-end replacement. Overall, the latest pattern still supports familiar search themes like jobs AI will replace and AI job risk, while also reinforcing that regulated, physical, and relationship-heavy occupations remain harder to automate fully.

Week: August 26, 2026

46.47 Weekly Average Risk

26 Jobs moving up

0 Jobs moving down

This Week in Context

These paragraphs turn the weekly table into a readable explanation of where automation pressure broadened, narrowed, or stayed steady.

The weekly average risk moved upward, which suggests pressure broadened rather than staying isolated to only a few roles.

The clearest upward pressure appeared in Software Tester, QA Engineer, Data Analyst. Moves like these often show where AI is taking on more repeatable drafting, comparison, coordination, or first-pass analytical work.

DevOps Engineer, Archivist, Barista changed little and help anchor the baseline for this week. Stable roles matter because they show where the ranking is holding its shape even while other parts of the market move.

Read these paragraphs together with the linked news and the full ranking. The point is not a one-week prediction of replacement, but a clearer view of where automation pressure is concentrating first.

How to Read This Week

This report works best when you read the summary, score movement, and linked news together. Treat it as a weekly reading of changing automation pressure, not as a one-week prediction that a profession will immediately disappear.

Weekly Average Risk

46.47

Week-over-week change

+0.13

Jobs moving up

Jobs moving down

Jobs unchanged

178

Trend

The chart shows how the overall weekly average has moved. It helps separate a broad market shift from changes limited to a smaller set of jobs.

Where Pressure Rose First

These jobs posted the strongest upward moves this week. Read them as signs of where automation pressure is tightening fastest right now.

Where Pressure Eased

These jobs moved downward this week. A lower score does not mean the role is safe forever, but it does suggest less immediate pressure relative to the prior week.

No notable movers this week.

Roles That Stayed Relatively Steady

These jobs changed little this week and help anchor the broader picture. Stability often matters as much as movement when judging whether a shift is broad or narrow.

This Week Ranking

Use the full ranking as a current snapshot of relative pressure across jobs. The score alone matters less than the combination of score, week-over-week change, and the task mix behind the role.

Rank	Job	Risk Score	Last Week	Change
1	Scheduler	94	94	+0
2	Software Tester	92	91	+1
3	Call Center Agent	89	89	+0
4	Customer Support Representative	89	89	+0
5	Administrative Assistant	86	86	+0
6	Office Clerk	86	86	+0
7	Customer Support	85	85	+0
8	Copywriter	84	84	+0
9	QA Engineer	84	83	+1
10	Data Analyst	84	83	+1
11	Telemarketer	83	83	+0
12	Data Entry Clerk	82	82	+0
13	Content Writer	81	81	+0
14	Retail Cashier	80	80	+0
15	Receptionist	79	79	+0
16	Bookkeeper	78	78	+0
17	Software Engineer	78	77	+1
18	Social Media Manager	77	77	+0
19	Accounting Clerk	77	77	+0
20	Digital Marketer	77	77	+0
21	Court Reporter	77	77	+0
22	Mobile App Developer	77	76	+1
23	Truck Driver	77	77	+0
24	Programmer	76	75	+1
25	Paralegal	76	76	+0
26	Proofreader	76	76	+0
27	SEO Specialist	76	76	+0
28	Illustrator	75	75	+0
29	Translator	74	74	+0
30	Insurance Underwriter	74	74	+0

This Week Ranking →

AI News Used In This Weekly Evaluation

The articles below are the main signals used in this week's evaluation. Read them as context for why pressure rose, fell, or stayed stable.

Kids outlearn AI—and we still don’t know why

MIT Technology Review / 2026-08-24

They Dedicated Their Lives to Teaching. Then the Deepfakes Started

Wired / 2026-08-24

How to encourage smarter AI use in the classroom

MIT Technology Review / 2026-08-24

The Single English County Saying No to Palantir

Wired / 2026-08-21

The Unlikely Place at the Center of China’s AI Boom

Wired / 2026-08-21

Unlocking hidden revenue streams with market models

MIT Technology Review / 2026-08-20

Debates over AI consciousness are a trap

MIT Technology Review / 2026-08-20

Silicon Valley Doesn't Get Why You Hate AI

Wired / 2026-08-20

Flock Has a Powerful New AI Tool for Police. We Got Its Code

Wired / 2026-08-19

VentureBeat names Rob Strechay as its first Lead Analyst, expanding its enterprise AI research push

VentureBeat / 2026-08-19

Coders Say They Already Found Workarounds to Claude’s Invisible Watermarks

Wired / 2026-08-19

I Saw the Future of AI in a Robot That Can Learn on the Spot

Wired / 2026-08-19

OpenAI Overhauls Safety Protocols After Its AI Agents Went Rogue

Wired / 2026-08-18

Past Weeks

Page Links

Jobs AI Risk by Industry Jobs Most at Risk from AI Jobs Least at Risk from AI Jobs Replaced by AI 200 Jobs Most Likely to Be Replaced by AI 200 Jobs Safest from AI AI Job Risk Checker Compare Two Jobs' AI Risk Side by Side Insights AI Risk by Country Weekly Evaluation Summary Annual Report Methodology Contact About Privacy Policy Terms of Service