Archive: discontinued method
These weekly summaries were produced from 2026-03 to 2026-10 by a weekly AI-generated scoring that this site no longer uses. Their scores are not comparable with the current figures, which come from public datasets. Why the method changed
Weekly AI Job Risk Summary — August 12, 2026
This week’s AI job risk update is mostly stable, with only small relative moves across jobs at risk from AI. The biggest themes were not pure capability gains, but mixed signals on adoption: the AI slop backlash and new controls in Docs, Gmail, and content platforms slightly reduce near-term replacement pressure for some writing, design, and media roles, because buyers and platforms are becoming more selective about low-quality automation. At the same time, AI interviews, meeting transcription tools, stronger weather prediction, and continued progress in AI-assisted coding, cybersecurity, and scientific discovery support modest risk increases for routine coordination, screening, and analytical work. Security incidents involving AI agents, browsers, worms, and hacking also reinforce that many high-stakes technical and regulated jobs still need human oversight, limiting immediate full automation. Overall, the ranking of jobs AI will replace first remains similar: repetitive digital workflow roles stay most exposed, while more hands-on, trust-based, and AI-proof jobs remain relatively less vulnerable this week.
How to Read This Week
This report works best when you read the summary, score movement, and linked news together. Treat it as a weekly reading of changing automation pressure, not as a one-week prediction that a profession will immediately disappear.
Weekly Average Risk
46.27
Week-over-week change
+0.01
Jobs moving up
13
Jobs moving down
13
Jobs unchanged
178
Trend
The chart shows how the overall weekly average has moved. It helps separate a broad market shift from changes limited to a smaller set of jobs.
Where Pressure Rose First
These jobs posted the strongest upward moves this week. Read them as signs of where automation pressure is tightening fastest right now.
Where Pressure Eased
These jobs moved downward this week. A lower score does not mean the role is safe forever, but it does suggest less immediate pressure relative to the prior week.
Roles That Stayed Relatively Steady
These jobs changed little this week and help anchor the broader picture. Stability often matters as much as movement when judging whether a shift is broad or narrow.
This Week Ranking
Use the full ranking as a current snapshot of relative pressure across jobs. The score alone matters less than the combination of score, week-over-week change, and the task mix behind the role.
| Rank | Job | Risk Score | Last Week | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scheduler | 93 | +1 | |
| 2 | Software Tester | 89 | +1 | |
| 3 | Call Center Agent | 89 | +0 | |
| 4 | Customer Support Representative | 89 | +0 | |
| 5 | Customer Support | 85 | +0 | |
| 6 | Administrative Assistant | 84 | +1 | |
| 7 | Office Clerk | 84 | +1 | |
| 8 | Copywriter | 85 | -1 | |
| 9 | Telemarketer | 83 | +0 | |
| 10 | Data Entry Clerk | 82 | +0 | |
| 11 | QA Engineer | 81 | +1 | |
| 12 | Data Analyst | 82 | +0 | |
| 13 | Content Writer | 82 | -1 | |
| 14 | Retail Cashier | 80 | +0 | |
| 15 | Receptionist | 78 | +1 | |
| 16 | Bookkeeper | 78 | +0 | |
| 17 | Social Media Manager | 78 | -1 | |
| 18 | Accounting Clerk | 77 | +0 | |
| 19 | Digital Marketer | 77 | +0 | |
| 20 | Court Reporter | 77 | +0 | |
| 21 | Truck Driver | 77 | +0 | |
| 22 | Paralegal | 76 | +0 | |
| 23 | Proofreader | 76 | +0 | |
| 24 | SEO Specialist | 77 | -1 | |
| 25 | Software Engineer | 75 | +1 | |
| 26 | Mobile App Developer | 76 | +0 | |
| 27 | Illustrator | 76 | -1 | |
| 28 | Translator | 74 | +0 | |
| 29 | Programmer | 73 | +1 | |
| 30 | Insurance Underwriter | 74 | +0 |
Exposure runs from 0 to 100 and compares occupations with each other, using public datasets (see sources). It is not a probability that the job disappears. Methodology
AI News Used In This Weekly Evaluation
The articles below are the main signals used in this week's evaluation. Read them as context for why pressure rose, fell, or stayed stable.
MIT Technology Review / August 10, 2026
MIT Technology Review / August 10, 2026
Wired / August 10, 2026
Wired / August 10, 2026
Wired / August 9, 2026
Wired / August 9, 2026
Wired / August 8, 2026
Wired / August 7, 2026
Wired / August 7, 2026
Wired / August 7, 2026
Wired / August 6, 2026
Wired / August 6, 2026
Wired / August 6, 2026
Wired / August 6, 2026
Wired / August 5, 2026
Wired / August 5, 2026
Wired / August 5, 2026
Wired / August 5, 2026
Wired / August 5, 2026
Wired / August 5, 2026
Past Weeks
- Weekly summary October 7, 2026
- Weekly summary September 30, 2026
- Weekly summary September 23, 2026
- Weekly summary September 16, 2026
- Weekly summary September 9, 2026
- Weekly summary September 2, 2026
- Weekly summary August 26, 2026
- Weekly summary August 19, 2026
- Weekly summary August 5, 2026
- Weekly summary July 29, 2026
- Weekly summary July 22, 2026
- Weekly summary July 15, 2026
- Weekly summary July 8, 2026
- Weekly summary July 1, 2026
- Weekly summary June 24, 2026
- Weekly summary June 17, 2026
- Weekly summary June 10, 2026
- Weekly summary June 3, 2026
- Weekly summary May 27, 2026
- Weekly summary May 20, 2026
- Weekly summary May 13, 2026
- Weekly summary May 6, 2026
- Weekly summary April 29, 2026
- Weekly summary April 22, 2026
- Weekly summary April 15, 2026
- Weekly summary April 8, 2026
- Weekly summary April 1, 2026
- Weekly summary March 25, 2026
- Weekly summary March 18, 2026
- Weekly summary March 14, 2026
- Weekly summary March 5, 2026