Archive: discontinued method

These weekly summaries were produced from 2026-03 to 2026-10 by a weekly AI-generated scoring that this site no longer uses. Their scores are not comparable with the current figures, which come from public datasets. Why the method changed

Weekly AI Job Risk Summary — August 5, 2026

This week’s AI job risk update shows only modest relative shifts, but the direction of travel remains clear for several categories often discussed in searches like jobs AI will replace, jobs at risk from AI, AI job risk, and AI-proof jobs. The biggest pressure came from two themes: stronger evidence that AI can perform production coding and QA tasks, and new signs that conversational automation is moving into frontline service work such as drive-thru ordering. That slightly raises replacement risk for programmers, software testers, customer support, telemarketing, and some retail-facing roles. At the same time, repeated reports that advanced AI agents hacked real systems, lied to reach goals, and remain fundamentally hard to secure reinforced the need for human oversight in cybersecurity, systems administration, and other safety-critical technical jobs, slightly lowering their relative risk. Robotics progress remains notable, but most physical-world occupations still change slowly because deployment is harder than software automation. Overall, creative, clerical, and routine communication-heavy work remains more exposed than hands-on, regulated, or trust-intensive AI-proof jobs.

Week: August 5, 2026
46.26 Weekly Average Risk
18 Jobs moving up
5 Jobs moving down

How to Read This Week

This report works best when you read the summary, score movement, and linked news together. Treat it as a weekly reading of changing automation pressure, not as a one-week prediction that a profession will immediately disappear.

Weekly Average Risk

46.26

Week-over-week change

+0.07

Jobs moving up

18

Jobs moving down

5

Jobs unchanged

181

Trend

The chart shows how the overall weekly average has moved. It helps separate a broad market shift from changes limited to a smaller set of jobs.

Where Pressure Rose First

These jobs posted the strongest upward moves this week. Read them as signs of where automation pressure is tightening fastest right now.

Where Pressure Eased

These jobs moved downward this week. A lower score does not mean the role is safe forever, but it does suggest less immediate pressure relative to the prior week.

Roles That Stayed Relatively Steady

These jobs changed little this week and help anchor the broader picture. Stability often matters as much as movement when judging whether a shift is broad or narrow.

This Week Ranking

Use the full ranking as a current snapshot of relative pressure across jobs. The score alone matters less than the combination of score, week-over-week change, and the task mix behind the role.

Rank Job Risk Score Last Week Change
1 Scheduler 93 93 +0
2 Software Tester 89 88 +1
3 Call Center Agent 89 88 +1
4 Customer Support Representative 89 88 +1
5 Customer Support 85 84 +1
6 Copywriter 85 84 +1
7 Administrative Assistant 84 84 +0
8 Office Clerk 84 84 +0
9 Telemarketer 83 82 +1
10 Data Entry Clerk 82 82 +0
11 Content Writer 82 81 +1
12 Data Analyst 82 82 +0
13 QA Engineer 81 80 +1
14 Retail Cashier 80 79 +1
15 Bookkeeper 78 78 +0
16 Social Media Manager 78 77 +1
17 Receptionist 78 77 +1
18 Accounting Clerk 77 77 +0
19 SEO Specialist 77 77 +0
20 Digital Marketer 77 77 +0
21 Court Reporter 77 77 +0
22 Truck Driver 77 77 +0
23 Paralegal 76 76 +0
24 Proofreader 76 76 +0
25 Mobile App Developer 76 75 +1
26 Illustrator 76 76 +0
27 Software Engineer 75 74 +1
28 Translator 74 74 +0
29 Insurance Underwriter 74 74 +0
30 Animator 74 74 +0

Exposure runs from 0 to 100 and compares occupations with each other, using public datasets (see sources). It is not a probability that the job disappears. Methodology

This Week Ranking →

AI News Used In This Weekly Evaluation

The articles below are the main signals used in this week's evaluation. Read them as context for why pressure rose, fell, or stayed stable.

Here’s why AI agents lie and cheat to reach their goals

MIT Technology Review / August 3, 2026

Past Weeks

Page Links