AI Job Risk in Sweden

Sweden combines a strong engineering and industrial base with a vibrant technology and startup sector, a very large public sector, and labor-market institutions built around strong unions and collective bargaining. AI exposure concentrates in administrative and standardized technical work, while Sweden's emphasis on lifelong learning, strong worker protections, and a public sector oriented toward retraining means displacement pressure is often absorbed through negotiated transition rather than abrupt job loss.

Average generative-AI exposure of the workforce

0.323

ILO score (0–1). Rank 6 of 20 countries.

People in employment, 2025

5,235,000

ILO modelled estimate

What people in Sweden work as

Share of employment in each ISCO-08 major occupation group, and the group's average generative-AI exposure (ILO score, 0–1). The country figure above is the employment-weighted average of the exposure column.

Occupation group Share of employment Exposure (ILO, 0–1)
Professionals
34.0%
0.39
Technicians and associate professionals
18.5%
0.35
Service and sales workers
16.3%
0.26
Craft and related trades workers
8.0%
0.17
Managers
6.3%
0.36
Skilled agricultural workers and elementary occupations
5.9%
0.15
Clerical support workers
5.8%
0.53
Plant and machine operators, and assemblers
5.2%
0.20

Method: each country's employment by ISCO-08 major occupation group (ILOSTAT, ILO modelled estimates) multiplied by the average ILO exposure score of the occupations in that group (ILO Working Paper 140), then added up. The ILO publishes skilled agricultural workers and elementary occupations as one group and leaves out the armed forces. The figure uses the ILO's 0–1 scale, not the 0–100 occupation index used elsewhere on this site, and it treats an occupation as equally exposed in every country.

How to read this page in practice

The notes below explain how to read the country figure, what kind of occupation mix raises or lowers it, and what this comparison can and cannot tell you.

How to Read This Country

Sweden is best read through the lens of its institutional strength as much as its industry mix. The country's engineering firms and technology startups generate real AI exposure in software-adjacent and process-engineering roles, but Sweden's collective-bargaining system and active labor-market policies mean the human impact of that exposure is shaped as much by negotiated retraining and transition support as by the technology itself. Its very large public sector, covering healthcare, education, and elder care, also anchors substantial employment in relationship-based work that AI can support but not replace.

What drives the figure

Sweden's employment concentrates in engineering and industrial manufacturing, a globally competitive technology and startup sector, telecom and forestry-linked industries, and an unusually large public sector delivering healthcare, education, and social care. AI pressure is strongest in standardized engineering documentation, software testing, financial administration, and back-office functions inside both industrial firms and government agencies. It is weaker in frontline public-sector roles such as nursing, elder care, and teaching, and in the hands-on engineering and manufacturing work that still requires physical problem-solving on production lines and in the forestry and mining operations that anchor Sweden's industrial regions.

What Holds Up Better

Sweden's resilience comes from the combination of strong worker protections and a public sector built around direct human care. Healthcare workers, teachers, and elder-care staff remain essential because their work is relational and physically present in ways AI cannot substitute for, and Sweden's collective-bargaining culture gives displaced workers structured pathways into retraining rather than leaving them exposed. Skilled engineers and technicians in advanced manufacturing also hold their value because Swedish industry competes on precision and innovation rather than low-cost repetition.

What This Page Does Not Claim

A national score cannot capture how Sweden's strong labor-market institutions change the practical meaning of exposure: a role can be technically automatable while remaining protected by collective agreements, active retraining programs, and a policy tradition that treats labor transitions as a shared responsibility. Read the score as a technical exposure measure, not a prediction of job loss, in a country where institutions actively mediate that transition.

Jobs Most At Risk from AI

This table is a current snapshot of the jobs that appear on the higher-risk side within this country profile. It is useful as a directional comparison, not as a permanent national ranking. Both lists only include jobs in the three occupation groups that employ the most people in Sweden, ordered by exposure index.

Rank Job Occupation group Generative-AI exposure
1 Interpreter Professionals 98
2 Translator Professionals 98
3 Web Developer Professionals 97
4 Technical Writer Professionals 96
5 Programmer Professionals 96
6 Content Writer Professionals 95
7 Copywriter Professionals 95
8 Data Analyst Professionals 95
9 Data Scientist Professionals 95
10 Software Tester Professionals 95
11 Advertising Specialist Professionals 94
12 Market Research Analyst Professionals 94
13 Marketing Specialist Professionals 94
14 SEO Specialist Professionals 94
15 Social Media Manager Professionals 94
16 IT Support Specialist Technicians and associate professionals 94
17 Editor Professionals 94
18 Sales Representative Technicians and associate professionals 93
19 Telemarketer Service and sales workers 93
20 Journalist Professionals 93

Jobs Safest from AI

This table shows the jobs that currently appear on the lower-risk side within this country profile. Read it as a structural comparison of work, not as a guarantee that these roles will stay unchanged.

Rank Job Occupation group Generative-AI exposure
1 Firefighter Service and sales workers 25
2 Ship Engineer Technicians and associate professionals 27
3 Water Treatment Operator Technicians and associate professionals 27
4 Veterinary Assistant Technicians and associate professionals 28
5 Paramedic Technicians and associate professionals 32
6 Dentist Professionals 33
7 Laboratory Technician Technicians and associate professionals 37
8 Pilot Technicians and associate professionals 39
9 Power Plant Operator Technicians and associate professionals 39
10 Security Guard Service and sales workers 39
11 Fitness Trainer Technicians and associate professionals 39
12 Barista Service and sales workers 39
13 Surgeon Professionals 39
14 Sound Engineer Technicians and associate professionals 41
15 Ship Captain Technicians and associate professionals 42
16 Bartender Service and sales workers 43
17 Chef Technicians and associate professionals 44
18 Cook Service and sales workers 44
19 Medical Assistant Technicians and associate professionals 46
20 Veterinarian Professionals 47

Frequently asked questions

Q.Which jobs are most at risk from AI in Sweden?

Most exposed: Interpreter, Translator, Web Developer. Sweden's employment concentrates in engineering and industrial manufacturing, a globally competitive technology and startup sector, telecom and forestry-linked industries, and an unusually large public sector delivering healthcare, education, and social care. AI pressure is strongest in standardized engineering documentation, software testing, financial administration, and back-office functions inside both industrial firms and government agencies.

Q.Which jobs are safest from AI in Sweden?

Least exposed: Firefighter, Ship Engineer, Water Treatment Operator. Sweden's resilience comes from the combination of strong worker protections and a public sector built around direct human care. Healthcare workers, teachers, and elder-care staff remain essential because their work is relational and physically present in ways AI cannot substitute for, and Sweden's collective-bargaining culture gives displaced workers structured pathways into retraining rather than leaving them exposed.

Q.How exposed is Sweden to AI automation?

Sweden is best read through the lens of its institutional strength as much as its industry mix. The country's engineering firms and technology startups generate real AI exposure in software-adjacent and process-engineering roles, but Sweden's collective-bargaining system and active labor-market policies mean the human impact of that exposure is shaped as much by negotiated retraining and transition support as by the technology itself. Its very large public sector, covering healthcare, education, and elder care, also anchors substantial employment in relationship-based work that AI can support but not replace.

Q.Does high exposure mean jobs will disappear in Sweden?

A national score cannot capture how Sweden's strong labor-market institutions change the practical meaning of exposure: a role can be technically automatable while remaining protected by collective agreements, active retraining programs, and a policy tradition that treats labor transitions as a shared responsibility. Read the score as a technical exposure measure, not a prediction of job loss, in a country where institutions actively mediate that transition.

Keep exploring

AI Risk by Country

Related reading

By the AI Job Risk Index editorial team

Page Links