AI Job Risk in United States

The United States runs on a uniquely large layer of white-collar knowledge work — software, finance, insurance underwriting, corporate law, consulting, and administrative support — sitting alongside at-will employment rules that let firms restructure headcount faster than in most other economies. That combination makes AI adoption both unusually visible and unusually fast to convert into actual job changes, while a huge, geographically spread service and care economy, from hospitals to logistics yards, keeps a large share of work tied to physical presence and direct human contact.

Average generative-AI exposure of the workforce

0.316

ILO score (0–1). Rank 9 of 20 countries.

People in employment, 2025

170,186,000

ILO modelled estimate

What people in United States work as

Share of employment in each ISCO-08 major occupation group, and the group's average generative-AI exposure (ILO score, 0–1). The country figure above is the employment-weighted average of the exposure column.

Occupation group Share of employment Exposure (ILO, 0–1)
Professionals
23.4%
0.39
Technicians and associate professionals
17.5%
0.35
Service and sales workers
14.6%
0.26
Managers
11.7%
0.36
Skilled agricultural workers and elementary occupations
10.8%
0.15
Clerical support workers
8.3%
0.53
Craft and related trades workers
8.1%
0.17
Plant and machine operators, and assemblers
5.6%
0.20

Method: each country's employment by ISCO-08 major occupation group (ILOSTAT, ILO modelled estimates) multiplied by the average ILO exposure score of the occupations in that group (ILO Working Paper 140), then added up. The ILO publishes skilled agricultural workers and elementary occupations as one group and leaves out the armed forces. The figure uses the ILO's 0–1 scale, not the 0–100 occupation index used elsewhere on this site, and it treats an occupation as equally exposed in every country.

How to read this page in practice

The notes below explain how to read the country figure, what kind of occupation mix raises or lowers it, and what this comparison can and cannot tell you.

How to Read This Country

Reading the United States well means separating the coastal, corporate knowledge economy from the service and operational economy that employs most workers day to day. Drafting, analysis, coding support, customer correspondence, and standardized financial or legal document work sit in the exposed layer, since employers face few contractual barriers to reorganizing these roles quickly. Healthcare delivery, skilled trades, logistics, retail floor work, and public-sector jobs sit in the durable layer, where physical tasks, licensing, and direct accountability to patients or customers slow substitution regardless of how capable the underlying models become.

What drives the figure

Employment concentrates in professional and business services, healthcare, retail, finance, technology, and a large logistics and warehousing sector built around national supply chains. AI pressure is sharpest in back-office finance, insurance claims processing, paralegal and contract review work, customer support centers, and entry-level software tasks, all of which are text-heavy and already digitized. It spreads more slowly through nursing and direct patient care, construction trades, truck driving and warehouse operations, and K-12 teaching, where physical work, licensure, and in-person trust remain central and where a fragmented, state-by-state regulatory system slows any uniform rollout.

What Holds Up Better

What holds up best are roles combining licensed responsibility with physical or interpersonal work: registered nurses, electricians and HVAC technicians, teachers, and first responders. The country's decentralized regulatory structure, with fifty separate states setting licensing and liability rules on their own terms, also slows any single wave of standardized automation from moving uniformly through regulated professions like healthcare and law, even as software tools inside those professions keep improving and law firms experiment with drafting assistance.

What This Page Does Not Claim

A single national score flattens enormous regional variation, from a Bay Area labor market dense with software roles to manufacturing and agricultural regions where AI exposure looks completely different. It also blends states with strong at-will hiring and firing against those with stronger worker protections. Read the number as a broad signal about a knowledge-heavy, flexible labor market, not as a claim that Silicon Valley and small-town Ohio face the same transition.

Jobs Most At Risk from AI

This table is a current snapshot of the jobs that appear on the higher-risk side within this country profile. It is useful as a directional comparison, not as a permanent national ranking. Both lists only include jobs in the three occupation groups that employ the most people in United States, ordered by exposure index.

Rank Job Occupation group Generative-AI exposure
1 Interpreter Professionals 98
2 Translator Professionals 98
3 Web Developer Professionals 97
4 Technical Writer Professionals 96
5 Programmer Professionals 96
6 Content Writer Professionals 95
7 Copywriter Professionals 95
8 Data Analyst Professionals 95
9 Data Scientist Professionals 95
10 Software Tester Professionals 95
11 Advertising Specialist Professionals 94
12 Market Research Analyst Professionals 94
13 Marketing Specialist Professionals 94
14 SEO Specialist Professionals 94
15 Social Media Manager Professionals 94
16 IT Support Specialist Technicians and associate professionals 94
17 Editor Professionals 94
18 Sales Representative Technicians and associate professionals 93
19 Telemarketer Service and sales workers 93
20 Journalist Professionals 93

Jobs Safest from AI

This table shows the jobs that currently appear on the lower-risk side within this country profile. Read it as a structural comparison of work, not as a guarantee that these roles will stay unchanged.

Rank Job Occupation group Generative-AI exposure
1 Firefighter Service and sales workers 25
2 Ship Engineer Technicians and associate professionals 27
3 Water Treatment Operator Technicians and associate professionals 27
4 Veterinary Assistant Technicians and associate professionals 28
5 Paramedic Technicians and associate professionals 32
6 Dentist Professionals 33
7 Laboratory Technician Technicians and associate professionals 37
8 Pilot Technicians and associate professionals 39
9 Power Plant Operator Technicians and associate professionals 39
10 Security Guard Service and sales workers 39
11 Fitness Trainer Technicians and associate professionals 39
12 Barista Service and sales workers 39
13 Surgeon Professionals 39
14 Sound Engineer Technicians and associate professionals 41
15 Ship Captain Technicians and associate professionals 42
16 Bartender Service and sales workers 43
17 Chef Technicians and associate professionals 44
18 Cook Service and sales workers 44
19 Medical Assistant Technicians and associate professionals 46
20 Veterinarian Professionals 47

Frequently asked questions

Q.Which jobs are most at risk from AI in United States?

Most exposed: Interpreter, Translator, Web Developer. Employment concentrates in professional and business services, healthcare, retail, finance, technology, and a large logistics and warehousing sector built around national supply chains. AI pressure is sharpest in back-office finance, insurance claims processing, paralegal and contract review work, customer support centers, and entry-level software tasks, all of which are text-heavy and already digitized.

Q.Which jobs are safest from AI in United States?

Least exposed: Firefighter, Ship Engineer, Water Treatment Operator. What holds up best are roles combining licensed responsibility with physical or interpersonal work: registered nurses, electricians and HVAC technicians, teachers, and first responders. The country's decentralized regulatory structure, with fifty separate states setting licensing and liability rules on their own terms, also slows any single wave of standardized automation from moving uniformly through regulated professions like healthcare and law, even as software tools inside those professions keep improving and law firms experiment with drafting assistance.

Q.How exposed is United States to AI automation?

Reading the United States well means separating the coastal, corporate knowledge economy from the service and operational economy that employs most workers day to day. Drafting, analysis, coding support, customer correspondence, and standardized financial or legal document work sit in the exposed layer, since employers face few contractual barriers to reorganizing these roles quickly. Healthcare delivery, skilled trades, logistics, retail floor work, and public-sector jobs sit in the durable layer, where physical tasks, licensing, and direct accountability to patients or customers slow substitution regardless of how capable the underlying models become.

Q.Does high exposure mean jobs will disappear in United States?

A single national score flattens enormous regional variation, from a Bay Area labor market dense with software roles to manufacturing and agricultural regions where AI exposure looks completely different. It also blends states with strong at-will hiring and firing against those with stronger worker protections. Read the number as a broad signal about a knowledge-heavy, flexible labor market, not as a claim that Silicon Valley and small-town Ohio face the same transition.

Keep exploring

AI Risk by Country

Related reading

By the AI Job Risk Index editorial team

Page Links