AI Job Risk in United States
The United States runs on a uniquely large layer of white-collar knowledge work — software, finance, insurance underwriting, corporate law, consulting, and administrative support — sitting alongside at-will employment rules that let firms restructure headcount faster than in most other economies. That combination makes AI adoption both unusually visible and unusually fast to convert into actual job changes, while a huge, geographically spread service and care economy, from hospitals to logistics yards, keeps a large share of work tied to physical presence and direct human contact.
Average generative-AI exposure of the workforce
0.316
ILO score (0–1). Rank 9 of 20 countries.
People in employment, 2025
170,186,000
ILO modelled estimate
What people in United States work as
Share of employment in each ISCO-08 major occupation group, and the group's average generative-AI exposure (ILO score, 0–1). The country figure above is the employment-weighted average of the exposure column.
| Occupation group | Share of employment | Exposure (ILO, 0–1) |
|---|---|---|
| Professionals |
23.4%
|
0.39 |
| Technicians and associate professionals |
17.5%
|
0.35 |
| Service and sales workers |
14.6%
|
0.26 |
| Managers |
11.7%
|
0.36 |
| Skilled agricultural workers and elementary occupations |
10.8%
|
0.15 |
| Clerical support workers |
8.3%
|
0.53 |
| Craft and related trades workers |
8.1%
|
0.17 |
| Plant and machine operators, and assemblers |
5.6%
|
0.20 |
Method: each country's employment by ISCO-08 major occupation group (ILOSTAT, ILO modelled estimates) multiplied by the average ILO exposure score of the occupations in that group (ILO Working Paper 140), then added up. The ILO publishes skilled agricultural workers and elementary occupations as one group and leaves out the armed forces. The figure uses the ILO's 0–1 scale, not the 0–100 occupation index used elsewhere on this site, and it treats an occupation as equally exposed in every country.
How to read this page in practice
The notes below explain how to read the country figure, what kind of occupation mix raises or lowers it, and what this comparison can and cannot tell you.
How to Read This Country
Reading the United States well means separating the coastal, corporate knowledge economy from the service and operational economy that employs most workers day to day. Drafting, analysis, coding support, customer correspondence, and standardized financial or legal document work sit in the exposed layer, since employers face few contractual barriers to reorganizing these roles quickly. Healthcare delivery, skilled trades, logistics, retail floor work, and public-sector jobs sit in the durable layer, where physical tasks, licensing, and direct accountability to patients or customers slow substitution regardless of how capable the underlying models become.
What drives the figure
Employment concentrates in professional and business services, healthcare, retail, finance, technology, and a large logistics and warehousing sector built around national supply chains. AI pressure is sharpest in back-office finance, insurance claims processing, paralegal and contract review work, customer support centers, and entry-level software tasks, all of which are text-heavy and already digitized. It spreads more slowly through nursing and direct patient care, construction trades, truck driving and warehouse operations, and K-12 teaching, where physical work, licensure, and in-person trust remain central and where a fragmented, state-by-state regulatory system slows any uniform rollout.
What Holds Up Better
What holds up best are roles combining licensed responsibility with physical or interpersonal work: registered nurses, electricians and HVAC technicians, teachers, and first responders. The country's decentralized regulatory structure, with fifty separate states setting licensing and liability rules on their own terms, also slows any single wave of standardized automation from moving uniformly through regulated professions like healthcare and law, even as software tools inside those professions keep improving and law firms experiment with drafting assistance.
What This Page Does Not Claim
A single national score flattens enormous regional variation, from a Bay Area labor market dense with software roles to manufacturing and agricultural regions where AI exposure looks completely different. It also blends states with strong at-will hiring and firing against those with stronger worker protections. Read the number as a broad signal about a knowledge-heavy, flexible labor market, not as a claim that Silicon Valley and small-town Ohio face the same transition.
Jobs Most At Risk from AI
This table is a current snapshot of the jobs that appear on the higher-risk side within this country profile. It is useful as a directional comparison, not as a permanent national ranking. Both lists only include jobs in the three occupation groups that employ the most people in United States, ordered by exposure index.
| Rank | Job | Occupation group | Generative-AI exposure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Interpreter | Professionals | 98 |
| 2 | Translator | Professionals | 98 |
| 3 | Web Developer | Professionals | 97 |
| 4 | Technical Writer | Professionals | 96 |
| 5 | Programmer | Professionals | 96 |
| 6 | Content Writer | Professionals | 95 |
| 7 | Copywriter | Professionals | 95 |
| 8 | Data Analyst | Professionals | 95 |
| 9 | Data Scientist | Professionals | 95 |
| 10 | Software Tester | Professionals | 95 |
| 11 | Advertising Specialist | Professionals | 94 |
| 12 | Market Research Analyst | Professionals | 94 |
| 13 | Marketing Specialist | Professionals | 94 |
| 14 | SEO Specialist | Professionals | 94 |
| 15 | Social Media Manager | Professionals | 94 |
| 16 | IT Support Specialist | Technicians and associate professionals | 94 |
| 17 | Editor | Professionals | 94 |
| 18 | Sales Representative | Technicians and associate professionals | 93 |
| 19 | Telemarketer | Service and sales workers | 93 |
| 20 | Journalist | Professionals | 93 |
Jobs Safest from AI
This table shows the jobs that currently appear on the lower-risk side within this country profile. Read it as a structural comparison of work, not as a guarantee that these roles will stay unchanged.
| Rank | Job | Occupation group | Generative-AI exposure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Firefighter | Service and sales workers | 25 |
| 2 | Ship Engineer | Technicians and associate professionals | 27 |
| 3 | Water Treatment Operator | Technicians and associate professionals | 27 |
| 4 | Veterinary Assistant | Technicians and associate professionals | 28 |
| 5 | Paramedic | Technicians and associate professionals | 32 |
| 6 | Dentist | Professionals | 33 |
| 7 | Laboratory Technician | Technicians and associate professionals | 37 |
| 8 | Pilot | Technicians and associate professionals | 39 |
| 9 | Power Plant Operator | Technicians and associate professionals | 39 |
| 10 | Security Guard | Service and sales workers | 39 |
| 11 | Fitness Trainer | Technicians and associate professionals | 39 |
| 12 | Barista | Service and sales workers | 39 |
| 13 | Surgeon | Professionals | 39 |
| 14 | Sound Engineer | Technicians and associate professionals | 41 |
| 15 | Ship Captain | Technicians and associate professionals | 42 |
| 16 | Bartender | Service and sales workers | 43 |
| 17 | Chef | Technicians and associate professionals | 44 |
| 18 | Cook | Service and sales workers | 44 |
| 19 | Medical Assistant | Technicians and associate professionals | 46 |
| 20 | Veterinarian | Professionals | 47 |
Sources
Exposure index calculated by ai-job-risk.net from the datasets below (data as of October 15, 2026). US labour figures are from the BLS, unchanged.
- Eloundou, Manning, Mishkin & Rock, "GPTs are GPTs: Labor market impact potential of LLMs", Science (2024); data MIT licence
- Gmyrek, Berg, Kamiński, Konopczyński, Ładna, Nafradi, Rosłaniec, Troszyński. Generative AI and Jobs: A Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure. ILO Working Paper 140. Geneva: ILO, 2025. © ILO, CC BY 4.0
- Tomlinson, Jaffe, Wang, Counts & Suri, "Working with AI: Measuring the Occupational Implications of Generative AI", Microsoft Research; CC BY 4.0
- Anthropic Economic Index (job_exposure); CC BY
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Projections 2025–35 and AI exposure categories
- ILOSTAT, ILO modelled estimates: employment by sex and occupation (ISCO-08), accessed 16 October 2026. © ILO, CC BY 4.0
The publishers did not prepare, review or endorse this site. Full citations, licences and method
Frequently asked questions
Q.Which jobs are most at risk from AI in United States?
Most exposed: Interpreter, Translator, Web Developer. Employment concentrates in professional and business services, healthcare, retail, finance, technology, and a large logistics and warehousing sector built around national supply chains. AI pressure is sharpest in back-office finance, insurance claims processing, paralegal and contract review work, customer support centers, and entry-level software tasks, all of which are text-heavy and already digitized.
Q.Which jobs are safest from AI in United States?
Least exposed: Firefighter, Ship Engineer, Water Treatment Operator. What holds up best are roles combining licensed responsibility with physical or interpersonal work: registered nurses, electricians and HVAC technicians, teachers, and first responders. The country's decentralized regulatory structure, with fifty separate states setting licensing and liability rules on their own terms, also slows any single wave of standardized automation from moving uniformly through regulated professions like healthcare and law, even as software tools inside those professions keep improving and law firms experiment with drafting assistance.
Q.How exposed is United States to AI automation?
Reading the United States well means separating the coastal, corporate knowledge economy from the service and operational economy that employs most workers day to day. Drafting, analysis, coding support, customer correspondence, and standardized financial or legal document work sit in the exposed layer, since employers face few contractual barriers to reorganizing these roles quickly. Healthcare delivery, skilled trades, logistics, retail floor work, and public-sector jobs sit in the durable layer, where physical tasks, licensing, and direct accountability to patients or customers slow substitution regardless of how capable the underlying models become.
Q.Does high exposure mean jobs will disappear in United States?
A single national score flattens enormous regional variation, from a Bay Area labor market dense with software roles to manufacturing and agricultural regions where AI exposure looks completely different. It also blends states with strong at-will hiring and firing against those with stronger worker protections. Read the number as a broad signal about a knowledge-heavy, flexible labor market, not as a claim that Silicon Valley and small-town Ohio face the same transition.